Exploring the Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Frontline Employees’ Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/g05ap515Keywords:
Organizational Justice, Organizational Commitment, Turnover Intention, Frontline Employees, Human Resource ManagementAbstract
Frontline workers are the linchpin of several organizations, as they have the primary customer interface and maintain day-to-day functioning of the company. In spite of that, employee turnover from this reservoir of employees is always an enduring concern for managers and human resource professionals. Here, I examine how employees’ fairness perception in the workplace may affect their intention to stay or leave, and does their level of organizational commitment make it account for that relation? Rather than relying purely upon theoretical arguing, it builds upon prior survey-oriented studies and incorporates it towards an integrative model that highlights the mental association between fairness, commitment, and turnover intention. It stated that if employees are of the view that there remain respectful and fair decision, then there will be more emotional attachment towards the firm, and subsequently, less turnover intention. It makes a contribution to the growing literature arguing that fairness perceptions have a role to play in employee turnover, particularly frontline employee turnover, for which stress and limited mobility are characteristic. In practice, managers who seek procedural publicity and candid communication may avoid not only dissatisfaction but also a more loyal and stable workforces.
References
[1]Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
[2]Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
[3]Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00043-X
[4]Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208
[5]Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49(3), 252–276. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043
[6]Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Barton, S. M. (2001). The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intent: A test of a structural measurement model using a national sample of workers. The Social Science Journal, 38(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(01)00110-0
[7]Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Mohler, C. J., & Schminke, M. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 1–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(01)20001-1
[8]Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
[9]Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
[10]Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
[11]Maertz, C. P., Jr., & Griffeth, R. W. (2004). Eight motivational forces and voluntary turnover: A theoretical synthesis with implications for research. Journal of Management, 30(5), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.04.001
[12]Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
[13]Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Eberly, M. B. (2008). Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 231–274. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211552
[14]Kim, S. L., & Beehr, T. A. (2018). Can empowering leaders affect subordinates’ well-being and careers because they encourage subordinates’ job crafting behaviors? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817727702
[15]Rego, A., Pina e Cunha, M., & Souto, S. (2007). Workplace spirituality, commitment, and self‐reported individual performance: An empirical study. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20(3), 378–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810710740230
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Qian Li, Shuai Wang, Keong-Sai Chan (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.